Skip to main content

Becoming a "More Perfect Union"

Happy Independence Day!

I've talked about a number of challenging issues on the DrUrbanPolicy blog: decreasing housing affordability, the need for better policies on infrastructure, gentrification and segregation, the need to plan better for our future, political corruption, the problems we face from lazy legislation and gerrymandered districts and more.  A discussion of policy change usually often means discussing problems - if there was no problem, there would be no need for policy to address it. Some may think about the challenges and be down on America - I opened the Washington Post this morning to read an article from a Canadian historian who gave his perspective that the American Revolution was a failure.

This week's overthrow of the Egyptian government and the 150th anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg are reminders of how unstable government can be. A century and a half ago, the country was torn in two, and Egypt's military just dissolved their government. The problems that I usually write about are crucial to people's lives, but they are nothing compared to the challenges of a revolution or civil war.  For that reason, I am positive about America and our future - we still have many challenges, but hard-working people are trying to address them, and we have a stable and open government that allows change to happen.

Every June the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) hands down their decisions for the current term before recessing for the summer, and it's the biggest late June event in DC (especially since fans of the local hockey and basketball teams have lots of free time during the late rounds of the playoffs).  In less than 24 hours, the SCOTUS ruled that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional and that Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act were unconstitutional.  Many people (other than Justice Kennedy) found at least one of these decisions problematic.  However, no one is rioting in the streets because the rule of law is clear and established.  Instead of civil unrest, legislators and policy people are deciding what new policies and laws could be adopted now that the SCOTUS has set the guidelines -- protecting freedom, equal opportunity and achieving other national goals is rarely a simple matter.

A healthy representative democracy doesn't mean that you always agree with the results, but that you accept their legitimacy and have outlets to change them. Happy Birthday, America - after 237 years, we're still working on getting democracy right, but no one said that creating a "more perfect union" would be easy. 

What do you think? You can follow me @DrUrbanPolicy on twitter and facebook, I'm happy to continue the conversation below or on social media.


Popular posts from this blog

Rethinking the Value of Diversity after the End of Race-Based Admissions Decisions

The recent Supreme Court decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College has sparked great discourse in the week since the decision, and in particular, fear amongst those who worry about losing a key tool to fight the legacy of discrimination and the continuing disadvantages that impact people of color in the US. In its decision, the Court’s majority ruled that admissions policies at Harvard and the University of North Carolina violated the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment. While a range of others, including Justices Jackson and Sotomayor, have laid out dissents and critiques of the decision, I have seen little discussion of the path forward for those who seek to ensure that more people from families and communities that have been impacted by racial prejudice over the nation’s history can benefit from a college education in the future.    You will read a different perspective here, building from experiences at four different univ

What Is a Livable Community, and How Do We Measure One?

Today, I kicked off AARP Public Policy Institute 's Livability Index project with a blog and two papers on new project webpage: bi.tly/LivIndex .  The PPI blog, " What Is a Livable Community, and How Do We Measure One? " introduces the project to the world. You may have wondered why I haven't been writing as much lately, and this project is what has been keeping me busy recently. In a way, this has been keeping me busy for years.

The "Boom" in Golden Girls-Style Shared Housing: Where’s the Beef?

NBC, Touchstone Television and their partners should be proud– it has been 22 years since the final episode aired, yet the influence of The Golden Girls   means that every year reporters ask about the boom in “Golden Girls Housing .”  This form of shared housing receives a great amount of attention, but we'll miss the big picture if we look for big numbers. For the last few years, I have looked at data from the Current Population Survey  (analyzed by the AARP Public Policy Institute ) to count households that are all female (or all male) with at least one non-related housemate or roommate, no spouses, and no one under 50 in the home. This is the classic “Golden Girls” formula.   The result has become familiar: a very small portion of the population lives in a “golden” situation, around one percent.  The small numbers of people in those situations means that it’s hard to figure out whether it has become more popular.  Though the percentage appears to be holding steady, th