Skip to main content

The Challenge of Making Homes More Accessible (#UDS5)

I didn't return to St. Louis for the 5th Universal Design Summit (#UDS5) this year, but following along from a distance has been great - the increased use of social media since 2010 has made that much easier. I'll use this occasion to share a few of my thoughts on creating more housing that meets UD goals with you.  First, some UD 101 for those who are unfamiliar: In housing, universal design's goal is to make homes more accessible to all people who might use the home, making special design or adaptations unnecessary if someone living in or visiting the home has physical difficulties or disabilities. (See the AARP Public Policy Institute Fact Sheet on UD for more)

The picture to the left represents one of the simplest examples of universal design - an outlet at a reachable height that passes the "hammer test."

If you look around the internet for advice on how high to place an outlet from the floor, you'll see several  recommendations to use the traditional method - placing the outlet box one hammer's height from the floor. This outlet in my office is higher than my trusty hammer, making it easier to reach from a seated position. This simple step has made it  easier to use for me, and if the next person to use this office uses a wheelchair, she would be able to reach it without much trouble. Similarly, light switches can be placed at a reachable height, doorways can be constructed with a 32" wide clear opening, bathrooms and kitchens can be built with enough space (60" diameter) to provide a turning radius for someone who would be in a wheelchair or use another device, and  entrances can be built that don't require steps.

Most commercial buildings and multifamily housing (e.g. apartments) have federal requirements that require builders to meet some of these types of standards (including those created by the ADA and Fair Housing Act) but there are no such requirements for single family homes. Note that none of these features are "hospital-like" or require that a building be outfitted in ways that are visibly focused on physical disability. One of the goals of advocates is to expand the number of homes that are built with universal design features, but that requires several strategies:

Above are three categories that are used to increase the availability of these features:  Mandates have been used in several states: for example, Vermont requires that homes that are "built without a known owner" have Visitability features in place - these are a subset of features that are designed to allow people to visit any home.  In other places, this is only required of buildings built with government funding assistance - including subsidized housing, government loans, etc.

Voluntary Incentives are the favorite of the building community, and are often easier to get into place.  These vary from tax incentives for building homes with improved access to designation programs that put a "stamp of approval" on homes that meet a certain threshold. Receiving permits faster if your company builds homes with better design is an incentive that has little to no cost for governments, so it can be a cost-effective motivator.

Information for consumers is a key component - In California, Assembly Bill 1400  required that "builders constructing new for-sale residential units to provide a 'checklist' of universal accessibility features to potential purchasers of a home."  However, if consumers don't understand the options or the benefits, then they won't demand them in great numbers. Educational campaigns and efforts from AARP and others help to educate consumers and opinion leaders about the benefits of designing housing that works for all.

In our surveys, focus groups and other research, I've learned that many people (and policymakers) don't prepare for the possibility of developing physical difficulties unless they have one or live with someone that has one. Many homeowners seem to buy homes that fit their families at a certain time and then are forced to adapt to homes that don't work for them later.  Universal Design and related concepts can provide homes that are better able to meet the needs of individuals and an aging society in the long run. For this reason, I hope that the attendees at #UDS5 had a successful event and are inspired to find new ways to make homes work better for all people.

What do you think about universal design?  Share by leaving a comment below or @DrUrbanPolicy. 


  1. Thanks again and looking forward for your post on making more. This looks like a great resource. I'm very interesting to read your blog. Thanks for posting this.

    check out here: Discovery Holidays


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Rethinking the Value of Diversity after the End of Race-Based Admissions Decisions

The recent Supreme Court decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College has sparked great discourse in the week since the decision, and in particular, fear amongst those who worry about losing a key tool to fight the legacy of discrimination and the continuing disadvantages that impact people of color in the US. In its decision, the Court’s majority ruled that admissions policies at Harvard and the University of North Carolina violated the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment. While a range of others, including Justices Jackson and Sotomayor, have laid out dissents and critiques of the decision, I have seen little discussion of the path forward for those who seek to ensure that more people from families and communities that have been impacted by racial prejudice over the nation’s history can benefit from a college education in the future.    You will read a different perspective here, building from experiences at four different univ

What Is a Livable Community, and How Do We Measure One?

Today, I kicked off AARP Public Policy Institute 's Livability Index project with a blog and two papers on new project webpage: bi.tly/LivIndex .  The PPI blog, " What Is a Livable Community, and How Do We Measure One? " introduces the project to the world. You may have wondered why I haven't been writing as much lately, and this project is what has been keeping me busy recently. In a way, this has been keeping me busy for years.

The "Boom" in Golden Girls-Style Shared Housing: Where’s the Beef?

NBC, Touchstone Television and their partners should be proud– it has been 22 years since the final episode aired, yet the influence of The Golden Girls   means that every year reporters ask about the boom in “Golden Girls Housing .”  This form of shared housing receives a great amount of attention, but we'll miss the big picture if we look for big numbers. For the last few years, I have looked at data from the Current Population Survey  (analyzed by the AARP Public Policy Institute ) to count households that are all female (or all male) with at least one non-related housemate or roommate, no spouses, and no one under 50 in the home. This is the classic “Golden Girls” formula.   The result has become familiar: a very small portion of the population lives in a “golden” situation, around one percent.  The small numbers of people in those situations means that it’s hard to figure out whether it has become more popular.  Though the percentage appears to be holding steady, th