Skip to main content

A Transit-Oriented Hospital as a Community Anchor

Here is a development situation that is unfolding in real time: Dimensions Healthcare System, Prince George’s County, Md officials and the University of Maryland Medical System are meeting on Thursday to discuss the location of the new regional hospital that will replace the problematic Prince George’s Hospital Center. There are four prospective sites, all in the central area of the county near interchanges on I-495, the Capital Beltway. County officials' shortsightedness may cause the hospital to be built in a location that seems optimal at a glance, but won't serve residents best - this is a perfect opportunity to use a hospital as an anchor for transit-oriented development.

Much of the attention has gone to the former Landover Mall site, currently a sea of asphalt and home to a  Sears department store - the only survivor of a shopping mall that failed in the last decade. It's just inside the beltway, more than a mile from the closest Metro station, and not far from another prospective site, the Woodmore Town Center.  There one would find a new shopping center, home to an upscale grocery store and many open lots. The third site is near the Morgan Boulevard Metro, inside the beltway and between an area with light industrial uses and a new housing development.  The fourth is my preferred choice, in the Largo Town Center Metro Station area, an outside-the-beltway location, next to another, slightly older outdoor mall, near under-utilized commercial parks, and across from townhouses, condominiums and apartments.

A view of part of the site from Lottsford Road.
(Largo Town Center Metro Station is to the right)

In this part of the county, the beltway generally serves as a dividing line between the older, more developed sections "inside the beltway" and the higher-income areas "outside the beltway." Perceptions of crime also generally lessen as one moves east, away from Southeast Washington, DC. A closed-off traditionally suburban-style campus in Landover with most access by automobile/bus and limited pedestrian traffic is a likely scenario - safety concerns and distance from Metro would weigh on the minds of developers. Development in Prince George's has historically lagged behind the other counties in the region, and the county's station areas lack the kinds of transit-oriented development seen around urban and suburban metro stations elsewhere in the region. (See my earlier essay on some of the reasons why).  This history is more than just a problem - it provides an opportunity.

 An AARP/Streetfilms video that we did highlighting equitable TOD success in Arlington County, Va. We did not find a similar location in Prince George's County, Md.

It has been nearly a decade since the Metro station in Largo has been built, and the lack of development adjacent to the station has disappointed residents. They have watched the Boulevard at the Capital Centre (the outdoor mall) fail to meet its potential, in part due to the lack of development elsewhere in the station area. The perfect tenant for the site would be a large employer to maximize the millions of dollars that were spent expanding the Metro, and a $650 million hospital center not only fits that criteria, but putting it in a location that fails to maximize the positive impact of the investment would be a waste. Most of the other sites under consideration are far from Metro, which would replicate a key problem that plagues the current hospital center in Cheverly: patients, visitors and staff without car have a difficult time accessing the facility. From a real estate perspective, the best chance of getting hospital staff to live in the community around the hospital is by building it in an outside the beltway location where the neighborhoods are generally safer. Locating this station at any of the other sites would be wasting a key opportunity to move forward. Taking advantage of the opportunity means creating a hospital that best achieves smart growth principles.

As a homeowner, the president of a community association in the neighborhood, a researcher on transit-oriented development (see my AARP Public Policy Institute report on housing near transit), and the author of a dissertation that includes Largo as a case study (see chapter 4), I have multiple perspectives on the location, and all of that research and experience leads me to prefer this site.  In conversations with other homeowners and and community leaders, I've found that enthusiasm is not just for any hospital center, but one that:

  • complements the character of the neighborhood
  • includes mixed-use development with neighborhood-scale retail,
  • includes well-designed, accessible public space that serves the hospital and the neighborhood, 
  • encourages staff to live nearby and walk to work and to use transit, and
  • minimizes emergency traffic on neighborhood streets. 
They also expect that a new major employer would have a positive impact on the existing retail and commercial development in the area.

Hospital planners should take the advantages of an outer-beltway, Metro accessible location into account: it would be part of a transit and commercial hub in the center of the county and would lack the stigma of an inner-beltway location that may impact some people's perception of the hospital before it opens its doors. Designers should create an asset that both current and future residents can utilize.

Existing residents are not asking for something unheard of: George Washington University Hospital in DC is the closest example, but our friends at the Coalition for Smarter Growth put together ten other design examples of hospitals where this has been done. Prince George’s should no longer be behind the curve: they should build the right hospital in the right location - the Largo Metro Station Area. They could build it elsewhere, but why not make the right decision this time?

Update 3/1/13 - The hearing was last night - see my reaction post with a few personal reflections here:  "Reflections on A Transit-Oriented Hospital"

 Do you have an opinion about where this hospital should be located?  Like DrUrbanPolicy on Facebook and follow on Twitter, then share your thoughts on those sites or below. 

As a reminder, these are my thoughts only and do not necessarily represent the positions of any organization. The views, opinions and judgments expressed are solely my own. This essay has not been reviewed or approved by AARP or any of the Largo community associations.


Popular posts from this blog

Rethinking the Value of Diversity after the End of Race-Based Admissions Decisions

The recent Supreme Court decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College has sparked great discourse in the week since the decision, and in particular, fear amongst those who worry about losing a key tool to fight the legacy of discrimination and the continuing disadvantages that impact people of color in the US. In its decision, the Court’s majority ruled that admissions policies at Harvard and the University of North Carolina violated the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment. While a range of others, including Justices Jackson and Sotomayor, have laid out dissents and critiques of the decision, I have seen little discussion of the path forward for those who seek to ensure that more people from families and communities that have been impacted by racial prejudice over the nation’s history can benefit from a college education in the future.    You will read a different perspective here, building from experiences at four different univ

What Is a Livable Community, and How Do We Measure One?

Today, I kicked off AARP Public Policy Institute 's Livability Index project with a blog and two papers on new project webpage: bi.tly/LivIndex .  The PPI blog, " What Is a Livable Community, and How Do We Measure One? " introduces the project to the world. You may have wondered why I haven't been writing as much lately, and this project is what has been keeping me busy recently. In a way, this has been keeping me busy for years.

The "Boom" in Golden Girls-Style Shared Housing: Where’s the Beef?

NBC, Touchstone Television and their partners should be proud– it has been 22 years since the final episode aired, yet the influence of The Golden Girls   means that every year reporters ask about the boom in “Golden Girls Housing .”  This form of shared housing receives a great amount of attention, but we'll miss the big picture if we look for big numbers. For the last few years, I have looked at data from the Current Population Survey  (analyzed by the AARP Public Policy Institute ) to count households that are all female (or all male) with at least one non-related housemate or roommate, no spouses, and no one under 50 in the home. This is the classic “Golden Girls” formula.   The result has become familiar: a very small portion of the population lives in a “golden” situation, around one percent.  The small numbers of people in those situations means that it’s hard to figure out whether it has become more popular.  Though the percentage appears to be holding steady, th