Skip to main content

Election 2012 - Sorry About the Wait

The President mentioned in his victory speech that we "have to fix" the situation at the polls for those who waited "in line a long time." Whatever your politics are, you have to agree with that sentiment - people in Miami were waiting in line past midnight. No wonder that Florida wasn't called on election night coverage - this may be the first time that people voted after Election Day.  (It also explains makes me feel better about the late timing of that speech and the concession speech - I can't imagine waiting in line to vote after an election had already been conceded.) 

Voters wait in a two-hour line inside a Maryland polling place
Why were people in Miami-Dade waiting for so long? If their experiences with Florida's 11 amendments were as complicated as has been reported (and five hour wait times seems to confirm that they were) it's another confirmation that voters are being asked to do too much (see Lazy Legislation parts 1 and 2). In my Maryland precinct, the normal 15 minute vote time was over two hours. Was this solely because of higher turnout this year?  I doubt it- Maryland's overall voter turnout dropped.

When one of the election officials offered a copy of the seven Maryland ballot questions and several county charter amendments to anyone who hadn't read them yet, dozens of hands shot up. I then noticed that many people were taking upwards of fifteen minutes in the booth. It was then that I realized for those that didn't read the questions (or my blog posts) beforehand, it could be a daunting experience to read, analyze and decide a  position on each question on the fly. Unlike most other places on modern life, cell phones, computers and other "communication devices" are banned in Maryland voting locations (presumably to prevent voter fraud.) This also prevents someone from phoning a friend or looking up ballot question analysis on a smart phone to help them decide how to vote. It may be a good idea to ban these devices, but the end result is that many have to make decisions on the fly. I was surprised to see this, and I wondered once again about the value of having voters decide complex legislative matters.

There's always a way to improve things - I daydreamed about possible reforms, such as having copies of ballot questions offered to all voters as they walk into the polling station, or perhaps a separate line for those who hadn't made their choices before entering the polling place. I'm not sure if that same dynamic was happening in Florida, but I don't think that it's too much to ask that we set up a system that allows any voter who gets into line before closing time to be able to enter their vote before election day ends.  As of 2012, 32 states and DC allow people to vote in person prior to the official Election Day and 27 states and DC allow no-excuse absentee ballots for mail-in votes (Oregon and Washington are all-mail.) If things are too complicated for the average voter to process on the fly, maybe these forms of voting can remove some of the time pressure on individuals.

In the end, Maryland voters approved every ballot question - I related to the comedian's joke that many voters just wanted to click "I agree" on the bottom of the electronic ballot as if it were a too-long service agreement for an online computer program. My original thought stayed the same - if we are asking too much of the voter, then it may be time to ask more of the legislators.

 How long did you wait to vote, and what reforms would you like to see? Comment below and share your reaction on twitter and facebook.


Popular posts from this blog

Rethinking the Value of Diversity after the End of Race-Based Admissions Decisions

The recent Supreme Court decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College has sparked great discourse in the week since the decision, and in particular, fear amongst those who worry about losing a key tool to fight the legacy of discrimination and the continuing disadvantages that impact people of color in the US. In its decision, the Court’s majority ruled that admissions policies at Harvard and the University of North Carolina violated the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment. While a range of others, including Justices Jackson and Sotomayor, have laid out dissents and critiques of the decision, I have seen little discussion of the path forward for those who seek to ensure that more people from families and communities that have been impacted by racial prejudice over the nation’s history can benefit from a college education in the future.    You will read a different perspective here, building from experiences at four different univ

What Is a Livable Community, and How Do We Measure One?

Today, I kicked off AARP Public Policy Institute 's Livability Index project with a blog and two papers on new project webpage: bi.tly/LivIndex .  The PPI blog, " What Is a Livable Community, and How Do We Measure One? " introduces the project to the world. You may have wondered why I haven't been writing as much lately, and this project is what has been keeping me busy recently. In a way, this has been keeping me busy for years.

The "Boom" in Golden Girls-Style Shared Housing: Where’s the Beef?

NBC, Touchstone Television and their partners should be proud– it has been 22 years since the final episode aired, yet the influence of The Golden Girls   means that every year reporters ask about the boom in “Golden Girls Housing .”  This form of shared housing receives a great amount of attention, but we'll miss the big picture if we look for big numbers. For the last few years, I have looked at data from the Current Population Survey  (analyzed by the AARP Public Policy Institute ) to count households that are all female (or all male) with at least one non-related housemate or roommate, no spouses, and no one under 50 in the home. This is the classic “Golden Girls” formula.   The result has become familiar: a very small portion of the population lives in a “golden” situation, around one percent.  The small numbers of people in those situations means that it’s hard to figure out whether it has become more popular.  Though the percentage appears to be holding steady, th